.
O

n a chilly November evening in 2011, Poland’s foreign minister, Radoslaw Sikorski, stood before the German Society of Foreign Affairs in Berlin and delivered one of the best speeches of his career.

At the time, the Eurozone appeared to be on the brink of an existential crisis. Sikorski, no stranger to controversy, ventured forward with an idea his more staid colleagues never would have dared suggest. He called upon Germany, Poland’s traditional antagonist, to awaken from its slumber and lead Europe out of decline. “There is nothing inevitable about Europe’s decline,” Sikorski said:

I demand of Germany that, for your own sake and for ours, you help [the Eurozone] survive and prosper. You know full well that nobody else can do it. I will probably be the first Polish foreign minister in history to say so, but here it is: I fear German power less than I am beginning to fear German inactivity…

We are standing on the edge of a precipice. This is the scariest moment of my ministerial life but therefore also the most sublime.

The speech made headlines around the world. The Financial Times ran excerpts as an op-ed article. Edward Lucas, an editor with The Economist and one of the foremost experts on Central and Eastern Europe, went so far as to say that it “marked a crucial turning point in European history.”

What made Sikorski’s speech so impactful? John Richardson, a senior fellow with the German Marshall Fund in Brussels, explained it in these words: “This was the speech of a politician who knows his history, does not want to repeat its mistakes, and has the strength and the clarity of mind to formulate a convincing message of hope for the future based on mutual trust between the European nations, which the crisis has so far called into question.”

But there was more to it than this. As Richardson pointed out, Sikorski’s speech also displayed something painfully absent amid the troubles crippling the Eurozone: it was “a demonstration of authority, personality, and charisma.” In other words, it showed leadership.

Expressing leadership is at the heart of effective speechwriting, and it is the subject of a new book entitled Speechwriting for Leaders by Charles Crawford, veteran U.K. Foreign Office speechwriter and Britain’s former ambassador to Poland (2003-07).

It may come as little surprise to some that Sikorski consulted Crawford, a fellow Oxonian, on matters of style when he crafted his speech. While Crawford makes clear the final speech was “very much Sikorski’s own work,” the principles that that speech embodies and exemplifies are those described by Crawford in his lively and entertaining new guide to the subject.

Crawford himself is no stranger to an unconventional but highly effective diplomatic style. During his tenure as Britain’s ambassador to Belgrade, for example, he once borrowed two kangaroos from a passing zoo to enliven a commercial reception. But he is also an accomplished wordsmith who understands that the key to good speechwriting for leaders lies in a simple maxim—that it is “not what the speaker says, but what the audience hears” that matters.

The words are, however, only part of what an audience hears on the day a speech is delivered. Crawford points out that they also hear the speaker’s commitment, energy, integrity, and respect for themselves and the occasion. They hear ‘More, please!’ or they hear ‘Never again!” As this book shows, up to and including the highest levels speeches can fail spectacularly because a leader does not get all these different jigsaw pieces to fit.

Crawford’s book belongs to a long and rich tradition. From the earliest beginnings of civilization, humankind has placed a high value on public speaking. At first learned by practice and example, the art of public speaking (oratory, as the ancients called it) emerged and flourished as a formal discipline in classical Greece as early as Homer in the eighth century B.C. But it was not until the fifth century that the craft of speechwriting began to develop, possibly after Antiphon, an Athenian statesman and one of the ten Attic orators, started writing out speeches for others to memorize and deliver. Since then, countless books on rhetoric have been written to help guide public speakers (and writers) in finding effective ways to express themselves and persuade or motivate their audience.

Speechwriting for Leaders is different. In the first place, it is not another guide to rhetorical devices, dryly rehearsing the patterns and figures of speech identified and studied by the Greeks and Romans. “Much expert advice about speechwriting and speechmaking is clunky,” Crawford says, “often plodding through descriptions of how the ancient Greeks and Romans developed ethos, pathos, logos, and all those ingenious figures of speech that are said to remain relevant today.”

While Crawford does not dismiss these, he sets his gaze higher. “Leader” is the operative word, and the book concentrates on “how speechwriters help leaders to convey (or fail to convey) engaging, memorable messages, and to avoid mistakes that sometimes can be very subtle.” Crawford illustrates his theme with vivid examples drawn from personal experience, and by observations whetted by three decades of experience in the practice of diplomacy and his own high-level public speaking. He analyses speeches by many world leaders with a sharp, if not merciless, eye to detail, technique, and tone.

In the second place, this book was written with a view to trends in the new millennium toward brevity, personal interchange, and global connectedness. It explores the new challenges (and opportunities) for public speakers that have emerged with the advent of teleprompters, voice recognition software, Twitter, and social media networking.

“Today’s leaders don’t like risks,” Crawford writes. "They know that their mistakes or gaffes can race round the world on YouTube or Twitter before the speech is even finished. So they fake it."

This book, however, provides a remedy. Speechwriting for Leaders is a lively, shrewd, and, above all, engrossing practical guide to speechwriting and public speaking for today’s top-level leaders in all fields—from politics and diplomacy to business and academia. It builds on the first guide to speechwriting prepared for internal use in the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office, which of course was also written by Crawford in the 1980s.

Speechwriting for Leaders also makes public, for the first time, various Foreign Office cables, obtained under the U.K. Freedom of Information Act, which not only help to illustrate its theme, but also shed light on Western diplomacy in central Europe after the Cold War.

This article was originally published in the Diplomatic Courier's January/February 2015 print edition.

About
Paul Nash
:
Toronto-based Correspondent Paul Nash is a frequent China commentator.
The views presented in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily represent the views of any other organization.

a global affairs media network

www.diplomaticourier.com

Speechwriting for Leaders

January 5, 2015

O

n a chilly November evening in 2011, Poland’s foreign minister, Radoslaw Sikorski, stood before the German Society of Foreign Affairs in Berlin and delivered one of the best speeches of his career.

At the time, the Eurozone appeared to be on the brink of an existential crisis. Sikorski, no stranger to controversy, ventured forward with an idea his more staid colleagues never would have dared suggest. He called upon Germany, Poland’s traditional antagonist, to awaken from its slumber and lead Europe out of decline. “There is nothing inevitable about Europe’s decline,” Sikorski said:

I demand of Germany that, for your own sake and for ours, you help [the Eurozone] survive and prosper. You know full well that nobody else can do it. I will probably be the first Polish foreign minister in history to say so, but here it is: I fear German power less than I am beginning to fear German inactivity…

We are standing on the edge of a precipice. This is the scariest moment of my ministerial life but therefore also the most sublime.

The speech made headlines around the world. The Financial Times ran excerpts as an op-ed article. Edward Lucas, an editor with The Economist and one of the foremost experts on Central and Eastern Europe, went so far as to say that it “marked a crucial turning point in European history.”

What made Sikorski’s speech so impactful? John Richardson, a senior fellow with the German Marshall Fund in Brussels, explained it in these words: “This was the speech of a politician who knows his history, does not want to repeat its mistakes, and has the strength and the clarity of mind to formulate a convincing message of hope for the future based on mutual trust between the European nations, which the crisis has so far called into question.”

But there was more to it than this. As Richardson pointed out, Sikorski’s speech also displayed something painfully absent amid the troubles crippling the Eurozone: it was “a demonstration of authority, personality, and charisma.” In other words, it showed leadership.

Expressing leadership is at the heart of effective speechwriting, and it is the subject of a new book entitled Speechwriting for Leaders by Charles Crawford, veteran U.K. Foreign Office speechwriter and Britain’s former ambassador to Poland (2003-07).

It may come as little surprise to some that Sikorski consulted Crawford, a fellow Oxonian, on matters of style when he crafted his speech. While Crawford makes clear the final speech was “very much Sikorski’s own work,” the principles that that speech embodies and exemplifies are those described by Crawford in his lively and entertaining new guide to the subject.

Crawford himself is no stranger to an unconventional but highly effective diplomatic style. During his tenure as Britain’s ambassador to Belgrade, for example, he once borrowed two kangaroos from a passing zoo to enliven a commercial reception. But he is also an accomplished wordsmith who understands that the key to good speechwriting for leaders lies in a simple maxim—that it is “not what the speaker says, but what the audience hears” that matters.

The words are, however, only part of what an audience hears on the day a speech is delivered. Crawford points out that they also hear the speaker’s commitment, energy, integrity, and respect for themselves and the occasion. They hear ‘More, please!’ or they hear ‘Never again!” As this book shows, up to and including the highest levels speeches can fail spectacularly because a leader does not get all these different jigsaw pieces to fit.

Crawford’s book belongs to a long and rich tradition. From the earliest beginnings of civilization, humankind has placed a high value on public speaking. At first learned by practice and example, the art of public speaking (oratory, as the ancients called it) emerged and flourished as a formal discipline in classical Greece as early as Homer in the eighth century B.C. But it was not until the fifth century that the craft of speechwriting began to develop, possibly after Antiphon, an Athenian statesman and one of the ten Attic orators, started writing out speeches for others to memorize and deliver. Since then, countless books on rhetoric have been written to help guide public speakers (and writers) in finding effective ways to express themselves and persuade or motivate their audience.

Speechwriting for Leaders is different. In the first place, it is not another guide to rhetorical devices, dryly rehearsing the patterns and figures of speech identified and studied by the Greeks and Romans. “Much expert advice about speechwriting and speechmaking is clunky,” Crawford says, “often plodding through descriptions of how the ancient Greeks and Romans developed ethos, pathos, logos, and all those ingenious figures of speech that are said to remain relevant today.”

While Crawford does not dismiss these, he sets his gaze higher. “Leader” is the operative word, and the book concentrates on “how speechwriters help leaders to convey (or fail to convey) engaging, memorable messages, and to avoid mistakes that sometimes can be very subtle.” Crawford illustrates his theme with vivid examples drawn from personal experience, and by observations whetted by three decades of experience in the practice of diplomacy and his own high-level public speaking. He analyses speeches by many world leaders with a sharp, if not merciless, eye to detail, technique, and tone.

In the second place, this book was written with a view to trends in the new millennium toward brevity, personal interchange, and global connectedness. It explores the new challenges (and opportunities) for public speakers that have emerged with the advent of teleprompters, voice recognition software, Twitter, and social media networking.

“Today’s leaders don’t like risks,” Crawford writes. "They know that their mistakes or gaffes can race round the world on YouTube or Twitter before the speech is even finished. So they fake it."

This book, however, provides a remedy. Speechwriting for Leaders is a lively, shrewd, and, above all, engrossing practical guide to speechwriting and public speaking for today’s top-level leaders in all fields—from politics and diplomacy to business and academia. It builds on the first guide to speechwriting prepared for internal use in the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office, which of course was also written by Crawford in the 1980s.

Speechwriting for Leaders also makes public, for the first time, various Foreign Office cables, obtained under the U.K. Freedom of Information Act, which not only help to illustrate its theme, but also shed light on Western diplomacy in central Europe after the Cold War.

This article was originally published in the Diplomatic Courier's January/February 2015 print edition.

About
Paul Nash
:
Toronto-based Correspondent Paul Nash is a frequent China commentator.
The views presented in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily represent the views of any other organization.